Les Roulottes de la Champagne Campground, Bar-sur-Aube
Bar-sur-Aube property with outdoor pool, bar/lounge
- Free WiFi in lobby and free parking
Fabulous
Only stayed one night on way back to UK. The accommodation was lovely and so was the…
Great location only a few minutes walk to town centre, great facilities
TripAdvisor Traveller Rating: 4
From 107 reviews
Les Roulottes de la Champagne Campground, Bar-sur-Aube
from $55- Country caravan-gîte
- Country caravan – Hotel style
- Star cubes 2 people
- The Pod: An Unsual Accomodation in Champagne, in harmony with nature
Recent reviews
Fabulous 8.6 From 69 reviews
Les Roulottes de la Champagne Campground, Bar-sur-Aube
Very Good
Glamp!
Full of character and peace!
Les Roulottes de la Champagne Campground, Bar-sur-Aube
Very Good
great place stop on way through france - couple of nights with a pool and plenty of safe areas for kids.
Les Roulottes de la Champagne Campground, Bar-sur-Aube
Very Good
Quiet retreat
Stayed in a van, well fitted out.
Les Roulottes de la Champagne Campground, Bar-sur-Aube
Exceptional
Nice place!
Nice original place to stay in. Friendly staff running the place. Floors of the cars squeek however, and the swimming pool could have been open for longer. The cars you stay in are a little small for a family of 5, but we luckily were outside the full due with the lovely weather.
Les Roulottes de la Champagne Campground, Bar-sur-Aube
Exceptional
A really lovely place for families to stay...
I stayed here as a stop over on the way to and from the south of France with my husband and 3 young sons in a caravan and we all had a really excellent time, much more exciting than a hotel! There is a great park for the kids to run off steam, swimming pool and trampoline. Oh and not forgetting the horse and goat who my children loved to see. The staff are really friendly, helpful and there is an option to have breakfast, which I would recommend. I can't rate it highly enough, especially for families, we would definitely come back.
Is the description of this hotel not correct? Tell us
