All hotels in Macau, Macau
1 room, 2 adults
You can collect Hotels.com® Rewards nights here

The Malt House, Macau

4-star4 stars
355 Avenida da AmizadeMacauMacau

4-star hotel with restaurant, near Senado Square
  • Free buffet breakfast and free WiFi
Good6.6
Location
Great location
Cleanliness
Clean
Vibe
Decent vibe
Food
Food could be better
106See all 106 Hotels.com reviews
From 170 reviewsTripAdvisor Traveller Rating

The Malt House, Macau

from $105
  • Superior Room, 1 Double or 2 Twin Beds
  • Deluxe Room, 1 Double Bed
Want more choice? Check out our other properties in Macau.

At a glance

Key facts

  • This hotel has 212 rooms
  • This hotel is arranged over 21 floors
  • Staff speak English

Arriving/leaving

  • Check-in time starts at 2 PM
  • Check-out time is noon

Required at check in

  • Credit card or cash deposit required

  • Government-issued photo ID required

Travelling with others

Children

  • No cribs (infant beds)

Pets

  • Pets not allowed

Internet

  • Free WiFi in public areas

  • Free WiFi in rooms

Transportation

Parking

  • No parking

In the hotel

Food and drink
  • Free buffet breakfast
  • Restaurant
  • Bar/lounge
  • Coffee shop/café
  • 24-hour room service
Working away
  • One meeting room
Facilities
  • Safe-deposit box at front desk

In the room

Home comforts
  • Air conditioning
Be entertained
  • TV
Stay connected
  • Desk
  • Free WiFi
  • Phone

What’s around The Malt House, Macau

Landmarks

  • Heart of Macau
  • Senado Square (15-minute walk)
  • Ruins of St. Paul's Cathedral (18-minute walk)
  • Fortaleza do Monte (20-minute walk)
  • A-Ma Temple (29-minute walk)
  • Macau Tower (37-minute walk)
  • Macau Fisherman's Wharf (13-minute walk)
  • Leal Senado (15-minute walk)
  • Guia Fortress (18-minute walk)
  • Museum of Macau (20-minute walk)
  • Macau Tower Convention and Entertainment Centre (26-minute walk)

Getting around

  • Macau (MFM-Macau Intl.) 11-min drive
  • Onsite parking not available

The Malt House, Macau

Is the description of this hotel not correct? Tell us