Villa San Michele, Port Douglas
Upscale Macrossan Street villa with kitchenette, balcony
- Free WiFi and free parking
Superb
Service
Fantastic service
Location
Great location
Value for money
Best value for money
Pool
Great pool
TripAdvisor Traveller Rating: 4.5
From 735 reviews

Villa San Michele, Port Douglas
from $146- One Bedroom Apartment - Weekly Service
- One Bedroom Apartment - Daily Service
- Two Bedroom Apartment - Weekly Service
- Two Bedroom Apartment - Daily Service
Recent reviews
Superb 9.0 From 72 reviews
Villa San Michele, Port Douglas
Exceptional
Good value
The hotel is in an excellent location. The rooms are spacious and it's rates are great value.
Villa San Michele, Port Douglas
Very Good
Vacation
Good location.
Villa San Michele, Port Douglas
Exceptional
Location is amazing. Quick walk to everything you need in Port Douglas. Staff really helpful in booking other plans and activities. Wonderful rooms with relaxing balcony!
Villa San Michele, Port Douglas
Exceptional
The ladies at the check-in were very helpful and even called our tours for us to confirm the events and schedule pick-up times. Jackie was very nice and changed our rooms because she felt that the original room was not clean and wanted to make sure we were getting what we paid for. I would definitely stay at this hotel again. Our room was at the back of the hotel and there was no noise from the neighbors or any of the surrounding buildings. It was perfect for a 3 night stay.
Villa San Michele, Port Douglas
Exceptional
Convenient and comfortable villas.
Villa San Michele is a great choice, walking distance to warf and beach. Rooms spacious. Kitchen fairly well equipped. Check in staff very helpful. The pool was a great cool off spot! Many steps to upper rooms a caution for anyone who has difficulty with stairs. No elevator. The desk clerk at checkout was less knowledgeable and the transport service we were scheduled on for trip to airport was late, and caused us some stress, but we did make our flight.
Is the description of this hotel not correct? Tell us
