All hotels in Framingham, Massachusetts, United States of America
1 room, 2 adults
You can collect Hotels.com® Rewards nights here

Monticello Inn Framingham, Framingham

2.5 stars
90 Worcester RdFraminghamMA01702United States of America, 800-491-6126
Price GuaranteePrice Guarantee on hotel bookings. If you find a better price on exactly the same stay, we’ll either match it or give you a coupon. Click below for details.
2.2 / 5
  • Had no hot water at 1 P.M., was getting ready for a wedding. Front desk told me that…Oct 13, 2016
  • I wanted King bed non smoking didn't get it we got a queen smokingOct 8, 2016
179See all 179 Hotels.com reviews
From 83 reviewsTripAdvisor Traveller Rating

Monticello Inn Framingham, Framingham

Hotel Info: 866-539-8117

from $79
  • Standard Double Room, 2 Double Beds
  • Standard Room
  • Standard Room, 1 King Bed

At a glance

Key facts

Hotel size

  • This hotel has 63 rooms
  • This hotel is arranged over 1 floor

Arriving/leaving

  • Check-in time starts at 2 PM
  • Check-out time is 11 AM

Required at check in

  • Credit card or cash deposit required

  • Government-issued photo ID required

Travelling with others

Children

  • No cribs (infant beds)

Pets

  • Pets not allowed

Internet

  • Free WiFi in public areas

  • Free WiFi in rooms

Transportation

Parking

  • Free self parking

  • Free RV/bus/truck parking

In the hotel

Food and drink
  • Free continental breakfast
  • Coffee/tea in a common area
Working away
  • Computer station
Services
  • 24-hour front desk
  • Laundry facilities

In the room

Home comforts
  • In-room climate control (air conditioning)
  • Air conditioning
  • Coffee/tea maker
  • Iron/ironing board
Sleep well
  • Blackout drapes/curtains
Freshen up
  • Private bathroom
  • Shower only
  • Free toiletries
  • Hair dryer
Be entertained
  • TV
  • Premium TV channels
Stay connected
  • Free WiFi
  • Free local calls
Food and drink
  • Refrigerator (on request)
  • Microwave (on request)
  • Cookware, dishware, and utensils
More
  • Daily housekeeping

Recent reviews

2.2 /5 from 179 reviews

Monticello Inn Framingham, Framingham
Fair2.0 / 5
Oh, boy it's a throwback!
Our original lodging was cancelled at the last minute and we were somewhat desperate to find a place. We could not find another motel with two beds so decided a king would work better than sharing one queen. This hotel was probably really nice in the early 50s, furnishings were worn and scruffy, bath fixtures that lovely sea green, with matching tiles. I believe the carpet was somewhat new. Was puzzled by all the shopping carts outside most of the doors; turns out, several people live here year round. Felt rather bad for the place as it was so worn. Staff seemed nice enough.
1 night trip with friends
Monticello Inn Framingham, Framingham
Good3.0 / 5
Creepy
Couldn't find anyone at check in even though doors were open and everything was unlocked. No one answered the phone when i called while standing there. Eventually a man and woman emerged from a guest room looking disheveled and walked into the lobby to check me in.
1 night business trip
Monticello Inn Framingham, Framingham
Fair2.0 / 5
Dissapointed...
To be honest, I didn't have a good experience at this hotel. Housekeeping was imcompleted. There were some towels left at outside of my room. There were no towels in the room. Coffee was left in the coffee maker from the previous user. I don't think I will go back to this hotel...
1 night family trip
Monticello Inn Framingham, Framingham
Fair2.0 / 5
A great place to keep your pup during travels
The room smelled like someone was breeding pit bulls in it. There was dried blood on the pillow cases. The room was conveniently located however. Motel staff was friendly. Someone tried to check up on us in the middle of the night by opening our door. Luckily the deadbolt and chain lock were in working order.
1 night family trip
Monticello Inn Framingham, Framingham
Poor1.0 / 5
horrible
1 night business trip

See all reviews

Monticello Inn Framingham, Framingham

Is the description of this hotel not correct? Tell us