Carat Boutique Hotel, Budapest
4-star hotel with bar/lounge, near Hungarian State Opera House
- Free hot/cold buffet breakfast and free WiFi
Fabulous
WiFi
Good internet service
Breakfast
Tasty breakfast
Location
Great location
Amenities
Amenities are not the best
TripAdvisor Traveller Rating: 4.5
From 1,419 reviews

About Carat Boutique Hotel, Budapest
Recent reviews
Fabulous 8.6 From 227 reviews
Carat Boutique Hotel, Budapest
Very Good
Very pleasant staff. Super clean and comfortable.
Carat Boutique Hotel, Budapest
Very Good
Great Location
Conveniently located. Close to inner city and other points of interest and dining spots. We were given room that overlooked street and got noisy at night so we felt a city vibe :) The room itself painted in grey was a bit dull and quiet small in size. Other than that everything else was good. Great breakfast with a wide selection of products, hotel stuff helped to book shuttle to the airport. So we left quiet happy.
Carat Boutique Hotel, Budapest
Good
Great location, uncomfortable bed
Positives: Great location near a lot of the sights, places to eat, and public transportation. Clean hotel. Breakfast buffet which was included was pretty tasty. Needs Improvement: The front desk staff could be more friendly. The bed in my room was worn and soft, so not very comfortable. The hotel did offer to let me change rooms but that's a hassle so I declined. The positioning of the shower head on the side of the shower plus that there is only a half door resulted in me getting a lot of water everywhere when I took a shower.
Carat Boutique Hotel, Budapest
Very Good
None
Very good location and convenient to sightsee.
Carat Boutique Hotel, Budapest
Exceptional
Carat was great
Glad I stayed there.Close to decent eateries,clean and has good wifi.Good and cuorteous receptionist.Only complaint is that wall mounted shower head only rises to about 4feet from base of tub.This should not be a problem for a midgit but ordinary size people have to stay bent over to shower.
Is the description of this hotel not correct? Tell us
