All hotels in Hangzhou, China
1 room, 2 adults
You can collect Hotels.com® Rewards nights here

Xiangji Yard Boutique Hotel, Hangzhou (prefecture)

3 stars
No. 128, Dadou Road, Xiangji TempleHangzhouZhejiang310014China, ‏‎800-491-6126
Best Price GuaranteeIf you find a better price on the same exact stay within 7 days of booking, we’ll match it. See our ‘User Terms’ for details and recent changes.
Cleanliness
Dirty
Room
Room is not nice
Value for money
Poor value for money
WiFi
Bad internet service
From 8 reviewsTripAdvisor Traveller Rating
See TripAdvisor reviews

Xiangji Yard Boutique Hotel, Hangzhou (prefecture)

Hotel Info: ‎866-539-8117‎

from $440
  • Premium Suite
  • Suite
  • Japanese Style Superior
  • Japanese Style Suite
  • Standard, Two Single Beds
  • Superior
  • Superior, One Queen Bed

At a glance

Key facts

Hotel size

  • This hotel has 31 rooms
  • This hotel is arranged over 2 floors

Arriving/leaving

  • Check-in time starts at 2 PM
  • Check-out time is noon

Required at check in

  • Credit card or cash deposit required

  • Government-issued photo ID required

Travelling with others

Pets

  • Pets not allowed

Internet

  • Free WiFi in public areas

  • Free WiFi and wired Internet access in rooms

In the hotel

Food and drink
  • Free buffet breakfast daily
  • Restaurant
Working away
  • Conference space size (meters) - 40
  • One meeting room
Services
  • Luggage storage
Facilities
  • Year Built 2011

In the room

Home comforts
  • Air conditioning
  • Bathrobes
  • Slippers
  • Iron/ironing board (on request)
Sleep well
  • Down comforter
  • Blackout drapes/curtains
Things to enjoy
  • Yard
  • Individually decorated
  • Individually furnished
Freshen up
  • Designer toiletries
  • Hair dryer
Be entertained
  • 32-inch LCD TV
  • Cable TV channels
Stay connected
  • Free WiFi
  • Free local calls
Food and drink
  • Refrigerator
  • Free bottled water
More
  • Daily housekeeping
  • In-room safe

Xiangji Yard Boutique Hotel, Hangzhou (prefecture)

Is the description of this hotel not correct? Tell us